2023-05-252023-05-252023-02-23MATA, Ana Raquel. Desjudicialização da usucapião: breve análise do procedimento extrajudicial. 2023. 49 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Bacharelado em Direito) – Unidade Acadêmica Especial de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Cidade de Goiás, 2023.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/22620The movement to dejudicialize demands for effective access to justice has become a trend in Brazil, as for example occurred with the implementation of the out-ofcourt procedure to resolve demands involving inventory, sharing and divorce. Faced with the great contiguous of demands in the judiciary power, it is necessary to search for alternatives that make the solution of conflicts, giving a response in a more agile and less costly way possible. In this tuning, with the changes promoted by the reform of the Code of Civil Procedure, a great novelty was established with the promulgation of Law No. 13.105/2015, the procedural flexibilization of the institute of usucapion, and it may be required both by the extrajudicial and judicial means. This innovation was introduced by Art. 1,071 of the CPC, which increased Art. 216-A, the Public Records Act - LRP (Law No. 6,015/1973), instituting the out-of-court procedure. The present research aims to make an analysis of the efficiency, feasibility and obstacles of this procedure in the resolution of conflicts, as well as its applicability in the Municipality of Itapuranga/GO, being used as methodology the qualitative bibliographic research in doctrines, content of sites, scientific articles, laws and research in extrajudicial services of said city.porAcesso AbertoUsucapião judicialUsucapião extrajudicialFunção socialDesjudicializaçãoAcesso à justiçaJudicial usucapionExtrajudicial usucapionSocial functionDejudicializationAccess to justiceTCC