2022-05-302022-05-302021-11-12SILVA, Isabel Assunção. Capacitismo e sofrimento ético-político: um olhar aos estudantes com deficiência no ensino superior sob a perspectiva da dialética exclusão/inclusão. 2021. 57 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação) – Faculdade de Educação, Universidade, Goiânia, 2021.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/20802The present work consists of bibliographical research and seeks to reflect on ableism as a factor of ethical political suffering for people with disabilities, from the perspective of the exclusion/inclusion dialectic. Due to the dimension of the social model of disability, it will be reflected how ableism becomes a factor of suffering for people with disabilities. In summary, ableism is understood as prejudice directed at people with disabilities that place their abilities in a relationship of inferiority to people without disabilities, that is, it is assumed that only their organic condition is the cause to justify their possible disabilities. Ableism becomes, then, the impediment to potentializing of people with disabilities in society. The orientation towards the exclusion/inclusion dialectic becomes the possible way to dimension the implications of the suffering permeated by the ableism, because it is a perspective that defends the displacement of the individual understanding of suffering to the social scope, where it is possible to verify the conditions that foster the suffering expressed in the subjects. Considering, therefore, that ableism is a factor of suffering for students with disabilities, in the context of higher education, it is necessary to clarify the circumstances that lead to the suffering of these subjects. Thus, the objectives of this work are to understand the process of educational insertion of people with disabilities; present the concepts of ableism, ethical-political suffering and exclusion/inclusion dialectic; to discuss from the perspective of the exclusion/inclusion dialectic how ableism becomes a source of suffering for people with disabilities. In this sense, the contribution of Sawaia's exclusion/inclusion dialectic, which presents the defense of the relevant social determination in the development of subjectivities, supports the understanding of the relationship between ethical-political suffering and ableism, as it makes it possible to find explanations for the suffering of students with disabilities. In addition, the proposed investigation made it possible to reflect on the freedom of the person with disabilities. And from this understanding, enable the construction of possibilities of experiences that consider the implications of ethical-political suffering, creating conditions of power of action for these subjects. In conclusion, the discussion considered suffering, as ethical-political suffering related to ableism, as a result of the process of exclusion of people with disabilities. Faced with a society that limits social participation, that is, it includes the subject with a disability, marking their differences and limiting their possibilities of being and manifesting themselves in society, it takes away from this subject the freedom to become and develop their subjectivity in the relationship. with others. From the perspective of the exclusion/inclusion dialectic, it was also possible to understand that the ethical-political suffering of PWDs is expressed in their subjectivities, but it is of social origin, being generated by the ableism, which permeates the social relationships of people with disabilities. Thus, an individualization of responsibility for overcoming differences was perceived, disregarding the social implication on these issues. Finally, the search for knowledge of the social and collective responsibility of these issues should not be seen only as a factor of weakness in our society. But as a power of transforming action. Recognizing the weaknesses of our social structure, it is essential to have the optimism of envisioning the power of being human, even if under the influence of socially determined factorsporAcesso AbertoCapacitismoSofrimento ético-políticoExclusãoInclusãoAbleismEthical-political sufferingExclusionInclusionTCC