2021-09-212021-09-212007GARRAFA, Volnei; PRADO, Mauro Machado. Alterações na Declaração de Helsinque - a história continua. Revista Bioética, Brasília, DF, v. 15, n. 1, p. 11-25, 2007.1983-8042e- 1983-8034http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/19890The following article analyses the history paper played by Helsink Statement in the field of ethics in research with humans beings. The aforesaid document, built and reviewed several times during annual Meetings promoted by The World Medical Association, nevertheless began to receive severe criticism of the USA from the years 90's. Concerning this document, mainly, the articles 19, 29, and 30 had their legitimacy put under challenge. The referred articles are related to a double standard research usage as ethics measurement and a non obligation for clinical investigation sponsors to keep themselves responsible for any attention those related subjects after completed assays. This document analyses all long process for changing attempts, severely criticized under bioethics about the point of view, sided and imperialist US positions.porAcesso AbertoEthics in researchÉtica em pesquisaHelsinki StatementUnited States of AmericaDouble standardMoral imperialismThe World Medical AssociationDeclaração de HelsinqueDouble standardEstados Unidos da AméricaAssembléia Médica MundialImperialismo moralArtigo