A ultrassonografia no rastreamento da qualidade óssea na perspectiva da osteoporose

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível

Data

2016-04-04

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Universidade Federal de Goiás

Resumo

To determine the accuracy of the phalanx ultrasound and bone quality tracker element in view of osteoporosis, produce a review article covering the various diagnostic methods for osteoporosis; establish diagnostic tests ultrasonometry as bone quality, according to age, set a Bone Quality nomogram (UBPI) view ultrasound and build bone quality normal curve according to age setting the cut off of pathological risk. Methods: A descriptive, analytical study of diagnostic accuracy. Attended the screening 932 women, of these, 125 were selected for agreeing to participate and fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were oriented to addressing the Women's Hospital and Maternity Hospital Iris to achieve the phalanx ultrasound scans and bone densitometry. Results: to evaluate the osteossonografia phalanx in relation to spinal bone densitometry test sensitivity was 80% in Group 1 and 100% for G2, G3 and G4. In relation to the femur test sensitivity was 90% and G1 100% G2, G3 and G4. When analyzing the 50th percentile, there was a significant inverse correlation showing that the higher the age, the greater the loss of bone quality. When the disease risk was calculated the results were, for the age group 30-39 years the average: 0.68 and SD: 0.23; 40-49 years, mean 0.64 and SD: 0.28; 50-59, mean and SD years: 0.54 and 0.37, respectively, and finally, age> 60 years, mean and SD: 0.32 and 0.30. Conclusion: a phalanx of ultrasonometry proved to be a method of good accuracy, as part crawler osteoporosis, regarding the evaluation of bone quality. The sensitivity of the phalanx ultrasound was calculated and comparative test densitometry, effective results were obtained, varying between 80 and 100%. When the nomogram was built, it can be seen the evidence that bone quality has a gradual loss with increasing age, but also the ability of this method to check that early. As for the ultimate goal of building a normal curve to calculate the pathological risk the results were, for the age group 30-39 years the average: 0.68 and SD: 0.23; 40-49 years, mean 0.64 and SD: 0.28; 50-59 years, mean and SD: 0.54 and 0.37, respectively, and finally, age> 60 years, mean and SD: 0.32 and 0.30.

Descrição

Citação

ANDRADE, S. R.S. A ultrassonografia no rastreamento da qualidade óssea na perspectiva da osteoporose. 2016. 103 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2016.