FM - Artigos publicados em periódicos
URI Permanente para esta coleção
Navegar
Navegando FM - Artigos publicados em periódicos por Autor "Aguiar, Coracy Coelho de"
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
Item Comparison GnRH agonist short protocol and GnRH antagonist in Brazilian normoresponder patients undergoing their first cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation(2013-10) Arruda, Jalsi Tacon; Approbato, Mario Silva; Maia, Mônica Canêdo Silva; Silva, Tatiana Moreira da; Mendonça, Carolina Rodrigues de; Ramos, Marisa de Sousa; Rodrigues, Shirley Ribeiro Cardoso; Brito, Maria Zelia Pires; Aguiar, Coracy Coelho deObjective: to evaluate the results of gonadotropin-rele- asing hormone agonist (GnRH-ag) and gonadotropin- -releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) using daily dose fixed of rFSH, in Brazilian normoresponder patients undergoing their first in vitro fertilization or intracyto- plasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycle. methods: a total 50 women were included in this retros- pective comparative study. Patients were stimulated with standard 150 IU/day recombinant FSH (follitropin alfa). In group GnRH-ag a daily dose of leuprolide acetate (1 mg short protocol) was administered starting on day 1 of the cycle till the day of hCG injection. In GnRH-ant group a daily dose of cetrorelix acetate (0.25 mg) was administered when follicles reached a diameter of >- 14mm. Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (250 μg rhCG) was administered when at least three follicles of 18 mm in diameter were observed. Stimulation charac- teristics and outcome of both protocols were compared. Results: stimulation days with rFSH (11.0 vs. 9.24; p=0.0091), total doses of rFSH (2094 vs. 1365 IU; p<0.0001), GnRH using days (12.0 vs. 3.6; p<0.0001), and total doses of GnRH (1.2 vs. 0.9 mg; p=0.0001) was shorter in GnRH-antagonist group. The number of follicles (>-16mm) on day rhCG (6.76 vs. 4.64; =0.04) was higher in GnRH-ag group. There was no difference in the other parameters, nevertheless, the number oocytes retrieved (5.92 vs. 4.16; p=0.06) was higher in GnRH- -agonist group, but the fertilization rate (40.1 vs. 54.4 %; p=0.29) was higher in GnRH-antagonist group. The rates of chemical and clinical pregnancy were similar in two groups. Conclusion: controlled ovarian stimulation plays a major role in human reproduction and, it is well known that, even in normoresponders patients, the first treat- ment cycle exposes patients to a risk of either a low or an excessive ovarian response. In this study GnRH-ag and GnRH-ant provide comparable results, but antago- nist protocol was shorter period of stimulation.