Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/16764
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorCastro, Anelise Daher Vaz-
dc.creatorViana, Karolline Alves-
dc.creatorLeles, Cláudio Rodrigues-
dc.creatorCosta, Luciane Ribeiro de Rezende Sucasas da-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-22T11:04:44Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-22T11:04:44Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationDAHER, Anelise et al. Ineffectiveness of antibiotic-based pulpotomy for primary molars: a survival analysis. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada, Campina Grande, v. 15, n. 1, p. 205-215, 2015.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1519-0501-
dc.identifier.issne- 1983-4632-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/16764-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the two-year survival rate of primary molars treated with non-instrumentation endodontic treatment with mixed antibiotic paste containing chloramphenicol, tetracycline, zinc oxide and eugenol (CTZ pulpotomy), and compare it to the conventional root canal treatment with calcium hydroxide paste. Material and Methods: Thirty-six children, mean age 6.2 years old (standard deviation, SD=1.5), presenting at least one primary molar with irreversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp, were included in this prospective clinical study. Teeth were assigned to CTZ pulpotomy (Group I) or calcium hydroxide pulpectomy (Group II) and assessed clinically and radiographically for up to 26 months. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-rank test. Results: Fifty-three primary molars were treated in Group I (n=37) or Group II (n=16). Children were followed up for 1 to 26 months (mean=12.0; SD=7.1). Treatment failure rates were 73.0% in Group I and 31.3% in Group II. Overall, mean survival time was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval, CI 12.6–17.9); Group I (mean 13.2; 95% CI 10.2-16.3) had a lower survival rate than Group II (mean 18.9; 95% CI 14.5-23.2) (p=0.02). Necrotic pulp treatments had significantly lower survival rates (p=0.01) than pulpitis treatments. Conclusion: Non-instrumentation endodontic treatment of primary molars with CTZ paste resulted in a low survival rate in a two-year follow-up; its radiographic ineffectiveness discourages its use instead of conventional root canal endodontic treatment.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectAnti-bacterial agentspt_BR
dc.subjectRoot canal therapypt_BR
dc.subjectToothpt_BR
dc.subjectDeciduouspt_BR
dc.subjectPulpotomypt_BR
dc.titleIneffectiveness of antibiotic-based pulpotomy for primary molars: a survival analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.22-
dc.publisher.departmentFaculdade de Odontologia - FO (RG)pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:FM - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Artigo - Anelise Daher Vaz Castro - 2015.pdf255,11 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Baixar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons