Mestrado em História (FH)
URI Permanente para esta coleção
Navegar
Navegando Mestrado em História (FH) por Por Orientador "Arrais, Cristiano Alencar"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
Item Revue historique e revue de synthèse historique: o caso A. D. Xénopol(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2013-08-26) Borges, Clayton Ferreira e Ferreira; Arrais, Cristiano Alencar; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0048549261262609´This study aims to investigate the theory of the history of Romanian philosopher and historian Alexandru Dimitrie Xénopol from their articles published in the Revue Historique Synthèse between the years 1900 and 1914. Xénopol developed a theory of history based on its own classification of the sciences, where the characterization of facts formed the basis for a definition of the scientific character of the story, as a particular science where the notion of time owned a primary importance. Your requirement historicization of historical facts at a given time and place has consequently a greater emphasis on categories of change, evolution, development and transformation, these categories constitute a crucial dimension, the one that would interest will analyze the historical facts by history science.Item Historiografia inglesa em revista: a english historical review e a história pensada no século XIX(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2013-08-30) Silva, Leonardo de Jesus; Arrais, Cristiano Alencar; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0048549261262609This work aims to analyze the historiography production of English Historical Review from issues placed of history of historiography regarding the debate of establishment the historical thinking as scientific knowledge. We want to understand how some historians of the journal of the late nineteenth periodical, still at Victorian age, make one conception of scientific history in synchrony with the professionalization of history. Joining some concepts central to the history of ideas, such as historicism, we believe that the study may indicate new contributions to current theoretical and methodological discussions from the survey of the major texts and locating debates hitherto unknown. The English Historical Review is the result of the development of historical studies in the country and reflected the heterogeneity of the nineteenth century historiography, with its various historical schools. These reflections are rarely referenced the historiography of the nineteenth century, because they consider so misleading and pejorative that it was on the whole positivist, a-theoretical, traditional and political. The approach of the texts was made here considering the context of professionalization and dialogue between European production for the period and the English tradition. One of our references is continuity in respect the guiding question of history, heritage of a Whig historiography. The english historiography of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century reveals issues that do not allow us to clearly demarcate a break in paradigm, for example, or to establish models of professionalization and historical scientificization in European countries.