Mestrado em Administração (FACE)

URI Permanente para esta coleção

http://200.137.215.59/tede/handle/tde/176

Navegar

Navegando Mestrado em Administração (FACE) por Assunto "Administration of justice"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Da legalidade à legitimidade: vozes em torno da reforma dos tribunais de contas brasileiros no período de 2000 a 2017
    (Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2018-05-04) Luz, Bruno Batista de Carvalho; Guarido Filho, Edson Ronaldo; http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4763471A4; Sousa, Marcos de Moraes; http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4253770P2; Sousa, Marcos de Moraes; Ferreira, Vicente da Rocha Soares; Procopiuck, Mário
    The objective of this research was to investigate cultural policies related to the debate on the reform of Brazilian Audit Courts (TCs). The study focused on analyzing how accounts of legitimacy and framing strategies conducted by different categories of legal and non-legal actors manifested themselves in the debate on the reform of Brazilian TCs in the period from 2000 to 2017. In this sense, the debate on reform was understood as a field of dialogue and discussion that, between 2000 and 2017, allowed the shaping of the legitimacy of TCs, law enforcement organizations responsible for controlling public resources. With regard to the development of the research, first, the mobilization process on the reform was described. Second, the central arguments used by different categories of actors were analyzed. Third, through legitimacy accounts of the reform, the emerging legitimacy factors and the frameworks of the mobilization process were identified. Documentary data were used, such as parliamentary speeches, public hearings, debates and news. Interviews were also conducted with representatives of the various categories of actors, including professional corporations, media, academia, judiciary, and organized civil society. The data were analyzed using the content analysis technique with the support of NVivo software. The results showed (i) the centrality of professional corporations acting both in the mediation and the translation of the debate, and in the design of intervention strategies in the legal field; (ii) the identification of legitimacy factors emerging from the debate that signal a multidimensionality of the legitimacy of TCs; and (iii) evidence of the framework of the mobilization process on TC reform in three ways — as a legal process associated with the construction of legal meaning, as a normative process associated with behavior change at the interorganizational level, and as a responsive process integration between political and legal groups.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Determinantes emergentes da produtividade em Tribunais de Justiça estaduais
    (Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2019-02-22) Sátiro, Renato Máximo; Sousa, Marcos de Moraes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2038056571074237; Sousa, Marcos de Moraes; Najberg, Estela; Gomes, Adalmir de Oliveira
    Much has been discussed about the factors that would lead to an efficient or inefficient performance of the Brazilian Judiciary, and a part of the academic discussions regarding the field of Administration of Justice, concerns the performance/productivity antecedents related to the courts and magistrates. In this sense, the main objective of the present work was to discuss the determinant aspects of the productivity of the State Courts of Justice in Brazil and to test emerging variables that may help in this understanding. From an analysis of the literature, we selected the variables already consolidated: workload, human resources (effective servers and outsourced employees), investment in ICT; and the emerging variables: lawyers and conciliators. Data from the Justice in Numbers (Justiça em Números) Report and from the Brazilian Federal Council of the Bar Association OAB from the 2011 to 2017 years of the 27 Brazilian Courts of Justice were collected from a total of 189 observations. The inference technique used was the Multiple Regression with panel data. After the test and validation of the Regression model and assumptions, the hypothesis that the number of lawyers, the workload and the amount effective servers and outsourced employees affects the productivity of the courts is confirmed; on the other hand, it was concluded that investment in technology did not influence the productivity of the State Courts of Justice. Finally, the results point in the opposite direction of the CNJ guidelines; it was concluded that the number of conciliators is not related to the productivity of the Courts of Justice.