O processo de gestão e participação na universidade: limites, possibilidades e desafios na UFT
Carregando...
Data
2011-06-24
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
This study aims to understand the participation in the FUT management process according to the institutional documents and the university community perception: teachers, students, and administrative staff. To achieve the goal, we used an empirical-theoretical investigation, including bibliographic survey and documentary research, related to the written documentation about the FISEs, especially the FUT, and field research including the university community from seven campuses involved in the study. The study about the participation in the FUT management process had as basis the understanding in the social regulation process, resulting from the overlapping of the public and private spheres, and the liberal and materialist-historical democratic approaches. From this broader discussion, we make explicit the tension between the business-strategical and the participatory-democratical management perspectives and the participation in the business organizations and social institutions as the FISES. Owing to the social regulation perspective, we aim to understand the civil society participation in the Brazilian State modernization process, and in its bulge, the historical democratization of the Brazilian public university, in distinct moments, in its management process. We aim to deepen the discussion about the moment that the market power and the social organizations were made explicit tensioned by the State- 1990 to 2010- in which the private market sphere has been strengthened at the expense of public and showing the process of superior education marketization, making explicit, within the FISES, the neo professional, heteronomous, competitive, an operational nature characteristics. In this context the democracy, neoliberal-liberal, and minimalist values have been strengthened in the FISES and in the FUT, operationalized in the management logic and in the business strategical participation. This is also, the context in which we aim to understand the participation in the FUT management process, a university that, at first, shows an organized structure by councils and boards with the teachers, students, and administrative staff representation, favorable to a participation in the participatory-democratic perspective, but that implements a management very close to the management perspective, in which not even the
representative liberal participation has been consolidated. Owing that in the FUT deliberative councils there is a strong concentration of power in the managers‟ hands, it is even more distant from the consolidation of an effective participation in which the university community segments have more equality of participation in the deliberative spaces, as well as the expand of these segments participation in the institutional management process, covering, in addition to implementing, the highest levels and degrees in the decision-making process, as the definition of the guidelines, politics, financial management, and institutional evaluation.
Paradoxically, in the perspective of the participation as politics fight, although there is a demand from the university community to take part in the decision-making processes, there is a low participation in these same spaces and in activities or important actions that are happening in the university, mainly related to the policy guidelines proposition level. Though smaller in scale, the obstacles to the participation in the FUT management process don‟t differ from the obstacles in the society participation in general, and they are related to the way the production system and the social reproduction is organized and effective.
Descrição
Citação
CARVALHO, Roberto Francisco de. The management process and the university participation: limits, possibilities, and FUT challenges. 2011. 352 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2011.