Linguagem e gozo: da intersubjetividade ao real do objeto a em Lacan
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2023-04-26
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
This work aims to understand how Lacan's notion of the real led him to abandon an
understanding of the analytic experience as based on intersubjectivity. For that, it was
necessary to situate the following steps: the real thought as the impossible of
representation, an emptiness, an outside of the meaning irreducible to the signifier; the
real as das Ding – both elaborated by Lacan (1959-1960/1988) in Seminar 7: The Ethics
of Psychoanalysis (1959-1960/1988); and the real as object a – as elaborated in Seminar
10: Anxiety (1962-1963/2005). The first part of this work addresses how Lacan's
orientation towards a field of language, based on the emphasis on the symbolic, led him
to a definition of the unconscious ─ as part of the concrete, transindividual discourse, an
insistence of the signifying chain ─ which was based on a understanding of the analytic
experience as being of the order of intersubjectivity. This intersubjective relationship
takes place in the formation of the subject, in the relationship with the Other, in a field of
language. By way of a counterposition, in the second part, whose aim has its precedents
still in Seminar 2: The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis,
we argue that Lacan (1954-1955/1985) already anticipates the real as opaque, as the
indeterminate navel of the dream, which is capable of making any imaginary and
symbolic relationship with the Other that is guided by intersubjectivity and recognition
fade away. In the third part, we explain that Lacan in Seminar 7: The Ethics of
Psychoanalysis (1959-1960/1988) addressed the real as that which is not structured by
language, as a hole in the symbolic, an outside of meaning in which the subject is
excluded inside. Thus, beyond the subject in the intersubjectivity of his relationship with
the Other mediated by the signifier, there is the real of the Thing, which is behind the
subject and which works in the dimension of the cause. Finally, in the fourth part, we
explain that, in Seminar 10: Anxiety (1962-1963/2005), Lacan invented the object a as
the rest of the subjective operation in which the subject arises. The constitution of the
subject in the place of the Other leaves a residue irreducible to the signifier and outside
the signification, which is the object a. Anguish is a sign of the real, of object a, which is
impossible to be represented and recognized by the subject. The object a corresponds to
an absence of the signifier that is proper to the Thing, to a remainder, to the real that is
beyond an intersubjective relationship, as it makes the Other, through a contraposition,
barred, incomplete, lose its consistency.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Psicanálise , Linguagem , Intersubjetividade , Real , Gozo , Das Ding , Objeto a , Language , Intersubjectivity , Jouissance , Object a
Citação
SANTOS, R. O. Linguagem e gozo: da intersubjetividade ao real do objeto a em Lacan. 2023. 180 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia) - Faculdade de Educação, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2023.