Avaliação da qualidade da assistência de enfermagem em salas públicas de vacinação de Goiânia
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2017-05-26
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring the quality of care in vaccination rooms is essential to minimize
the occurrence of post-vaccination adverse events, such as immunization error, ensuring the
maintenance of confidence and adherence to immunization programs. OBJECTIVE: To
evaluate the quality of nursing care in the vaccination process. METHODOLOGY: Crosssectional
study in 10 vaccination rooms of a Sanitary District in the city of Goiânia. Data
collection took place from July to October of 2016, using observation and interview
techniques. 28 nursing professionals participated in the study, performing health care to 450
users with the preparation and administration of 736 doses of vaccines. The research was
approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Goiás. RESULTS:
The study made possible the observation of nursing care during the care of 450 users and the
preparation and administration of 736 doses of vaccines. The median age of the professionals
was 52.5 years. The predominant gender was female (92.8%). The medians of professional
training time and performance in the vaccination ward were 24.5 and 8 years, respectively.
Regarding vaccination training, 89.3% reported having gone through it in the past year. In
the evaluation of the quality of nursing care, the medium score at the screening and
registration stage was 54.7%, suggesting tolerable care. At the stage of preparation and
administration of vaccines, the medium score was 77.9%, suggesting borderline quality of
care. The nursing care provided at the Health Centers presented higher quality scores than at
the Centers of Integral Health Care (60.2% versus 49.6%, p <0.001). The most frequent
incidents/ immunization errors in the screening and registration stage were: lack of indication
of specific vaccines for the age group (44.6%) and lack of registration of the administered
vaccine in the Information System (40.3%). Regarding the incidents/ immunization errors in
the preparation and administration of vaccines, the absence of hand hygiene before and / or
after administration of the vaccine (93.9%), administration of the vaccine in the wrong
topography (48,7%) and administration of the vaccine with inadequate needle (45,4%) were
identified. In bivariate analysis, procedures with incident had lower quality scores than those
without incident (77,3% versus 87,4%, p < 0,001). A total of 318 immunization incidents /
errors occurred in the vaccination rooms, 166 in the screening and recording and 152 in the
preparation and administration of vaccines. In the screening and registration stages, the most
frequent were: absence of registration of the vaccine administered in the Information System
(47.6%) and absence of indication of specific vaccines for the age group (44.6%). In the
preparation and administration stages of vaccines, administration of the vaccine in the wrong
topography 74 (48.7%) and administration of the vaccine with the inadequate needle 69
(45.4%). There was a high frequency of non-adherence to hand hygiene before and / or after
administration of vaccines in 691 (93.9%) doses.The vaccines that showed a significant
positive correlation between quality of care and administration were Pentavalente, Hepatite A,
Pneumo 10, Meningo C, Tetra Viral, dTpa e Hepatite B. There was a significant negative
correlation between quality of care and administration of BCG, Yellow Fever and dT. Using
bivariate analysis, procedures with incidents/ immunization errors had lower quality scores
than those without incidents (77.3% versus 87.4%, p <0.001). The vaccines that showed a
significant positive correlation between quality of care and administration were Pentavalent,
Hepatitis A, Pneumo 10, Meningo C, Viral Tetra, DTP, dTpa and Hepatitis B. There was a
significant negative correlation between quality of care and administration Of BCG, yellow
fever and dT. CONCLUSION: This study allowed the identification of vulnerabilities that
interfere with the quality and safety of the vaccination process, indicating the need to
implement measures aimed at increasing safe practices and improving nursing care in primary health care.
Descrição
Citação
MOCHIZUKI, L. B. Avaliação da qualidade da assistência de enfermagem em salas públicas de vacinação de Goiânia. 2017. 103 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Enfermagem) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017.