Ensino religioso: análise do debate público e sua interface com direitos humanos
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2017-07-18
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
Based on the public debate token in the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 4439, which deals
with the nature of religious education in public schools, the present study analyzed whether
there was a speech based on human rights, to legitimize the option made by the denominational
entities that were made represented in the public debate. Chantal Mouffe's theory of agonist
democracy was used to affirm that speeches are acts of power that achieve social legitimacy. In
Brazil, speeches based on human rights only began to be heard in the military dictatorship.
Besides having been organized in a late way, there was an intense and programmed advertising
against these speeches. Based on this assumption, it was analyzed whether speeches that are
based on human rights found legitimacy among the denominational entities that were
represented in the public debate. Based on the statements of each of the representatives, content
analysis was used to infer the justifications used to legitimize the choice of the religious
teaching model, which should be adopted by public schools. The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights of 1948 was used as a human rights parameter for didactic purposes. However,
the theoretical framework adopted was based on a critical theory of human rights which affirms
the impossibility of drawing precise and determined concepts for these rights, as well as
questions its effectiveness for the protection of the dignity of the human person. From the
analysis made, it was concluded that speeches based on human rights were not very used, and
this have occurred because of at least three reasons: the lack of knowledge about these rights,
the misrepresentation of them, and the incongruity currently experienced by human rights.
Entities didi not find legitimacy in human rights so as to base their choices on them, because
they are insufficient to protect their interests, and even protect human dignity.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Citação
PAES, A. C. G. Ensino religioso: análise do debate público e sua interface com direitos humanos. 2017. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direitos Humanos) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2017.