As emoções em campo jurídico: o argumento da experiência vivida
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2019-04
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
This article proposes an argumentative and rhetorical study of a judgment
in a Second Instance Court in Brazil, in a moral damage case about false-HIV.
The text intends to show how the personal experience of a magistrate steps in the
formation of the understanding of a sentence. For this, the article traces a research in
different forms of rationality (formal logic, informal logic, argumentation in context
of interaction), seeking to locate the epistemological field in which the proposed
discussion is situated. We discuss yet the construction of rationality in legal territory,
pointing out the characteristics of a statement in the field of laws, in addition to
discussing Law as fertile territory for the argumentative construction of sentences.
In the case study, the paper also presents the “lived experience argument”, which
leads us to reflect on how close are the “letter” and the “spirit” of the law. We invited
authors like Plantin (2011; 2016), Perelman (1989; 1990; 1999; 2002), Angenot (2008),
Doury (2003), among others specifically of the legal territory, to help us in the task of
discussing the role of emotions in the texts of the law.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Argumentação, Emoções, Tribunal, Argumentation, Emotion
Citação
DAMASCENO-MORAIS, Rubens. As emoções em campo jurídico: o argumento da experiência vivida. Entrepalavras, Fortaleza, v. 9, n. 1, p. 170-189, jan./abr. 2019. DOI: 10.22168/2237-6321-11380. Disponível em: http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/1380. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.