Tinha um lamento no meio do caminho: a sobreposição de valores em interações argumentativas jurídicas
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2020-06
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
This study aims to analyze data from the legal domain. In this way, the focus is judgements
on Second Instance, about moral damages and situations of conflicting verbal interaction. The way
values are considered by judges during judgements is important in the description that we propose
here. The main objective of the present paper is to describe how argumentation is built in an
argumentative situation (PLANTIN, 2008). It is also intended to describe macro discursive and
interactional phenomena of discourse and the contra discourse of interactional argumentation
(CARIZZO, PLANTIN) presented for analysis. The theoretical contribution starts from the sociology
of verbal interactions, through classical studies on linguistic politeness (BROWN AND LEVINSON,
GOFFMAN, GRICE) and some contemporary interpretations (KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI,
TRAVERSO, AMOSSY). Our search includes theories from legal and rhetorical philosophers
(PERELMAN) and jurists who care about the performance of magistrates and how they deal with their
emotions (GARAPON, DUPRET, POSNER). The analysis shows that values ’overlapping (Value 1
→ Value 2) in a judgment of moral damages is less unusual than one might imagine.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Interação argumentativa, Conflito, Valores, Polidez, Dano moral, Argumentative interaction, Conflict, Values, Politeness, Moral damage
Citação
DAMASCENO-MORAIS, Rubens. Tinha um lamento no meio do caminho: a sobreposição de valores em interações argumentativas jurídicas. Soletras, São Gonçalo, n. 39, p. 120-142, jan./jun. 2020. DOI: 10.12957/soletras.2020.46748. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/soletras/article/view/46748. Acesso em: 5 abr. 2023.