Antileishmanial and cytotoxic activities of ionic surfactants compared to those of miltefosine

Resumo

Using the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of spin-labeled stearic acid and a spin label chemically attached to the membrane proteins, the interaction of miltefosine (MIL) and the ionic surfactants sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, anionic), cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC, cationic) and N-hexadecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate (HPS, zwitterionic) with the plasma membrane of Leishmania (L.) amazonensis promastigotes was studied. The spin-label EPR data indicated that the four compounds studied have the ability to increase the molecular dynamics of membrane proteins to a large extent. Compared to the other compounds, SDS produced the smallest increases in dynamics and demonstrated the lowest antileishmanial activity and cytotoxicity to J774.A1 macrophages. The activities of the other three compounds were not different from each other, but CTAC had a stronger activity against L. amazonensis promastigotes at higher cellular concentrations (> 1 × 109 cells/mL) and was the most effective against L. amazonensis-infected macrophages. However, CTAC was also the most cytotoxic to macrophages. By measuring the IC50/CC50 values for assays of different cell concentrations, we estimated the membrane-water partition coefficient (KM/W) as well as the concentrations in the membrane (cm50) and aqueous phase (cw50) of the compounds at their IC50/CC50. Compared to the other compounds, SDS showed the lowest value of KM/W and the highest value of cm50. In all experiments in this study, the data for the zwitterionic molecules HPS and MIL were not significantly different.

Descrição

Palavras-chave

Surfactant, Miltefosine, Leishmania, Macrophages, Membrane fluidity, Electron paramagnetic resonance

Citação

ALONSO, Lais et al. Antileishmanial and cytotoxic activities of ionic surfactants compared to those of miltefosine. Colloids and Surfaces B: biointerfaces, Amsterdam, v. 183, e110421, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110421. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092777651930565X. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.