Mining code changes undermine biodiversity conservation in Brazil
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
Protected areas (PAs) are vital for the conservation of Brazil’s
biodiversity (Barber et al. 2014). However, they are at risk
of a downgrade in legal status due to economic pressures on
natural resources (Bernard et al. 2014; De Marques & Perez
2014; Pack et al. 2016). Mining is one of the most urgent
environmental threats in Brazil (Ferreira et al. 2014; El Bizri
et al. 2016), with plans in place for a 10-fold increase in the
number of mining projects in c. 8 years. If all were developed,
the Brazilian territory occupied by mining would increase
23-fold in the near future. Currently, 12 697 projects
covering 98 × 105 ha are planned within PAs. Licensing
and exploitation of 53% of this land will depend on the
approval of three bills that intend to authorize mining in
areas where it was formerly forbidden. Here, we analyse the
potential consequences of the approval of these new policies
for conservation.
Brazil has a number of legal categories for land protection,
including strict PAs, sustainable-use PAs and indigenous
lands. Mining is only permitted in some sustainable-use PAs
(named APAs and ARIEs from their initials in Portuguese;
see Supplementary Material, available online). Today, 1195
mining projects covering 1.6 × 105 ha are established in these
areas, while 367 projects covering 4.2 × 105 ha are working
in PAs where mining is theoretically not allowed (Figs 1 and
2). The large impacted area in lands regulated as mining free has various explanations. For some PAs, the law allows
mining works to continue when they were approved prior to
the establishment of the PA (IBAMA 2004). For the others,
diverse misinterpretations of current law have led to improper
mining concessions and subsequent judicial battles (Ricardo
& Rolla 2006). In addition to direct habitat loss and the
frequent destruction of caves (Ferreira et al. 2014; Sayuri
et al. 2015), mining causes a range of secondary impacts.
The massive migration of workers to low-populated areas, as
well as the infrastructure associated with the project, further
increases habitat loss and opens up intact wild areas to illegal
forest colonization and exploitation (Laurance et al. 2009).
Mining activity itself also has an impact beyond its frontiers:
rivers downstream may be polluted (Castilhos et al. 2015) and
threatened by environmental accidents, such as the mining
dam collapse that devastated the Doce River and the Southeast Brazilian coast in November 2015 (Escobar 2015). Finally,
mining has often resulted in social problems and conflicts
with nearby communities (Hilson 2002; Haslam & Tanimoune
2016), such as the confrontation between miners and the Cinta
Larga indigenous tribe (Rolla & Ricardo 2013).
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Brazil, Protected areas, Conservation units, Future impact, Downgrading, Indigenous lands, Land-use change
Citação
VILLÉN-PÉREZ, Sara et al. Mining code changes undermine biodiversity conservation in Brazil. Environmental Conservation, Cambridge, v. 45, n. 1, p. 96-99, 2018. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892917000376. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environmental-conservation/issue/98830BA49154CB03E811A94F61017D46. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2023.