Quality of meta-analyses in freshwater ecology: a systematic review
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
1. Given the increasing use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology, their
protocols should be closely followed to ensure quality. Several checklists are available to guide researchers towards a high-quality meta-analytic study. Freshwater
ecology studies have a tradition of using experimental studies, which provide the
ideal data to test hypotheses using meta-analysis.
2. Here, we evaluated the quality of 114 meta-analyses in freshwater ecology and 86
meta-analyses in ecology and evolution for comparative purposes.
3. We found that many studies are still using the term meta-analysis incorrectly and
that this error persisted over time. The quality of the studies that did conduct a
formal meta-analysis has improved. Thus, we speculate that available guidelines
are being effective in improving the quality of meta-analytic studies. Quality was
not associated with the impact factor of the journal where the meta-analyses
were published or with the average number of citations.
4. In addition to the incorrect use of the term, we found that many studies failed to:
report heterogeneity statistics, evaluate temporal changes in effect size, conduct
publication bias analyses, address the collinearity among moderators, and provide
the data. In general, meta-analyses in ecology and evolution have only a slightly
better average score than meta-analyses in freshwater ecology.
5. Although the quality of meta-analyses in freshwater ecology has improved over
time, there is much room for improvement. Authors should not label their studies as meta-analyses if these methods were not used. Compliance with checklists should be widely fostered as meta-analyses are increasingly being used to
summarise findings in different areas of ecology. Authors, reviewers, and editors should use checklists to improve the quality of meta-analyses in freshwater
ecology
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Checklist, Systematization, Limnology, Prisma statement, Quantitative review
Citação
LODI, Sara; GODOY, Bruno S.; ORTEGA, Jean C. G.; BINI, Luis M. Quality of meta-analyses in freshwater ecology: a systematic review. Freshwater Biology, Hoboken, v. 66, n. 5, p. 803-814, 2021. DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13695. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/fwb.13695. Acesso em: 5 jul. 2023.