Proximity to research centers, fluvial accessibility, and dams presence drive sampling efforts for phytoplankton, zooplankton, and macrophytes in freshwater ecosystems
Carregando...
Data
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
Understanding biodiversity and monitoring ecosystems require robust sampling eforts
for important bioindicators like phytoplankton, zooplankton, and aquatic macrophytes. This study quantifed sampling eforts for these aquatic groups across
the Tocantins-Araguaia Basin in Central Brazil,
evaluating the infuence of geographic and environmental factors such as human development, fuvial and terrestrial accessibility, elevation variation, and
proximity to protected areas and research centers.
These variables align with the appeal and accessibility hypotheses, which help explain sampling patterns
observed across regions. A systematic review compiled 2,307 unique feld collection records, allowing
analysis of spatial and temporal sampling patterns.
The sampling efort was quantifed based on geographic coordinates per grid cell, with predictors analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Results
showed sampling was concentrated in the centralsouthern region, with phytoplankton covering 28.83%
of the area, macrophytes 16.13%, and zooplankton
11.9%. Key drivers of sampling efort included proximity to research centers, dam presence, and fuvial
accessibility. Additionally, protected areas and human
development infuenced sampling efort for specifc
biological groups. Despite these eforts, vast regions,
especially in the northern Araguaia River, remain
under-sampled, highlighting the need for comprehensive long-term sampling strategies to address critical
biodiversity knowledge gaps.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Appeal hypothesis, Accessibility, Hypothesis, Tocantins-Araguaia
Citação
NABOUT, João Carlos et al. Proximity to research centers, fluvial accessibility, and dams presence drive sampling efforts for phytoplankton, zooplankton, and macrophytes in freshwater ecosystems. Hydrobiologia, London, v. 852, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-025-05894-2. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-025-05894-2. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2025.