Modifi ed radical mastectomy sparing one or both pectoral muscles in the treatment of breast cancer: intra and postoperative complications

dc.creatorFreitas Júnior, Ruffo de
dc.creatorOliveira, Evelling Lorena Cerqueira de
dc.creatorPereira, Rubens José
dc.creatorSilva, Marco Aurélio Costa
dc.creatorEsperidião, Mauricio Duarte
dc.creatorZampronha, Rossana Araújo Catão
dc.creatorRibeiro, Luiz Fernando Jubé
dc.creatorQueiroz, Geraldo Silva
dc.creatorRahal, Rosemar Macedo Sousa
dc.creatorFerro, Júlio Eduardo
dc.creatorPaulinelli, Régis Resende
dc.creatorBarbosa, Silvania de Fátima Coelho
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-07T12:47:56Z
dc.date.available2019-11-07T12:47:56Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Modifi ed radical mastectomy is widely utilized in breast cancer treatment. However, no prospective compari- son has yet been made between the Madden technique (preservation of the pectoralis minor muscle) and the Patey technique (resection of this muscle). The aim of this work was to com- pare these two modifi ed radical mastectomy techniques, by analyzing their degrees of diffi culty and complications. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized trial at the Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás; and Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás. METHODS: 430 patients with breast cancer with an indication for modifi ed radical mastectomy were included in the program, of whom 426 pa- tients were available for analysis (225 allocated to Patey and 201 to Madden). The chi-squared and Student t tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: The patients’ demographics were well balanced between the two groups. The mean duration of the surgical procedures was 105 (± 29.9) and 102 minutes (± 33), for the Patey and Madden groups, respectively (p = 0.6). Hospital- ization duration was 2.3 days for both groups. The mean number of lymph nodes resected was 20.3 (± 7.6) for Patey and 19.8 (± 8.1) for Madden (p = 0.5). There were no differences in terms of vascular or nerve sections, hematomas or infections. The surgeons reported the same degree of diffi culty for the two methods. CONCLUSION: The removal of the pectoralis minor muscle did not infl uence any of the vari- ables studied. Therefore, either technique can be performed, at the surgeon’s discretion.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationFREITAS-JÚNIOR, Ruffo et al. Modified radical mastectomy sparing one or both pectoral muscles in the treatment of breast cancer: intra and postoperative complications. São Paulo Medical Journal, São Paulo, v. 124, n. 3, p. 130-134, 2006.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1516-31802006000300004 
dc.identifier.issn1516-3180
dc.identifier.issne- 1806-9460
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/18332
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFaculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)pt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectBreast cancerpt_BR
dc.subjectBreastpt_BR
dc.subjectMastectomypt_BR
dc.subjectTechniquespt_BR
dc.subjectComplicationspt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasmspt_BR
dc.titleModifi ed radical mastectomy sparing one or both pectoral muscles in the treatment of breast cancer: intra and postoperative complicationspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Artigo - Ruffo de Freitas Júnior - 2006.pdf
Tamanho:
89.6 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: