Fluxo e infalibilismo em Teeteto 151-160

dc.creator	Borges, Anderson de Paula
dc.date.accessioned	2019-11-05T13:31:39Z
dc.date.available	2019-11-05T13:31:39Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.description.abstract	In this paper I attempt to show why the role of flux in Theaetetus 151-160 is exclusively explanatory. I show that Plato uses material from Heraclitus’ flux (H) in order to create for Protagoras (P) the best available argument which can grant infallibility. In the first part of the paper I discuss, briefly, some controversies about two problems: how Plato is establishing the connections among the three theses and how he understands flux. In the second part I propose an analysis of 152a-c. On section III I give an explanation of 152c-157c, from the perspective of some passages that, in my view, are sufficient for to get the core meaning of flux in the Secret Doctrine and, in the final section (IV), I briefly resume the substantial virtues and defects of Plato’s argument for Protagoras.	pt_BR
dc.identifier.citation	BORGES, Anderson de Paula. Fluxo e infalibilismo em Teeteto 151-160. Journal of Ancient Philosophy. São Paulo, v. 6, n. 2, p. 1-30, 2012.	pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn	e- 1981-9471
dc.identifier.uri	http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/18322
dc.language.iso	por	pt_BR
dc.publisher.country	Brasil	pt_BR
dc.publisher.department	Faculdade de Filosofia - FAFIL (RG)	pt_BR
dc.rights	Acesso Aberto	pt_BR
dc.title	Fluxo e infalibilismo em Teeteto 151-160	pt_BR
dc.type	Artigo	pt_BR

Arquivos

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1