Rotulação na perspectiva do modelo dialogal da argumentação

Abstract

This work proposes the study of the labeling, from the resumption and anticipation, in the argumentative interaction. The objective is to verify if the labeling, when performing the movements of resumption and anticipation, can be constituted as a resource not only linguistic, but also argumentative. The theoretical approach starts from two different fields of study: Textual Linguistics and Argumentation. The first focusing on the labeling process (FRANCIS, [1994] 2003; CONTE, [1996] 2003; CARVALHO, 2005; KOCH, 2006; 2011; ALVES JUNIOR, 2011) and the second from studies of the dialogical perspective of argumentation (PLANTIN, 2008; 2018; GRÁCIO, 2010; 2012; 2013; DAMASCENOMORAIS, 2017; 2020; 2021). In addition to these two main theoretical perspectives, some assumptions of Conversational Analysis were mobilized (SACKS; SCHEGLOFF; JEFFERSON, 1974; KERBRATORECCHIONI, 2006; MARCUSCHI, [1986] 2003; KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI; PLANTIN, 1995; FÁVERO et al., 2010) assimilated and adapted by dialogical theory. The corpus of this research consists of an excerpt from the interview with Ricardo Salles conducted by the television program Roda Viva. The study follows a qualitative analysis, with an interpretive basis, based on the data obtained, we observed a relationship between the resumption and the anticipation with the emergence of stasis in the argumentative interaction.