Do traditional scientometric indicators predict social media activity on scientific knowledge? An analysis of the ecological literature
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
Traditional citation-based indicators and activities on Online Social Media
Platforms (OnSMP; e.g. Twitter) have been used to assess the impact of scientific research.
However, the association between traditional indicators (i.e., number of citations and
journal impact factor) and the new OnSMP metrics still deserve further investigations.
Here, we used multivariate models to evaluate the relative influence of collaboration, time
since publication and traditional indicators on the interest of 2863 papers published in five
ecological journals from 2013 to 2015 as given by nine OnSMP. We found that most
activities were concentrated on Twitter and Mendeley and that activities in these two
OnSMP are highly correlated. Our results indicate that traditional indicators explained
most of the variation in OnSMP activity. Considering that OnSMP activities are high as
soon as the articles are made available online, contrasting with the slow pace in which the
citations are accumulated, our results support the use of activities on OnSMP as an early
signal of research impact of ecological articles.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Citation rates, Ecology, Altmetric, Science evaluation, Social networks
Citação
NABOUT, João Carlos et al. Do traditional scientometric indicators predict social media activity on scientific knowledge? An analysis of the ecological literature. Scientometrics, Berlim, v. 115, p. 1007-1015, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2678-x. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-018-2678-x. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2023.