Doutorado em Filosofia (FAFIL)
URI Permanente para esta coleção
Navegar
Navegando Doutorado em Filosofia (FAFIL) por Por Orientador "Lopes, Adriana Delbó"
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
Item Foucault e a filosofia: da crítica do mesmo à abertura para o outro(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2022-05-03) Leal, Guilherme de Freitas; Lopes, Adriana Delbó; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6600189022732543; Lopes, Adriana Delbó; Almeida, Fábio Ferreira de; Kraemer, Celso; Marinho, Cristiane Maria; Aggio, Juliana OrtegosaThe thesis aims to collaborate in understanding the relationship between Foucault and philosophy. Glimpsing the tripartite field of philosophy observed to occur post-Kant, Foucault calls this moment philosophical modernity precisely because the infinite as foundation leaves the scene and finitude starts to sustain itself. Crossing the critical project — the Critique of Pure Reason, the Critique of Practical Reason, and the Faculty of Judgment — with Anthropological Reflection, Foucault absorbs the philosophical tradition through Kant, concatenating, in addition, in Nietzsche a radical answer that will allow him to build his own thought analytics. Foucault observes that the source, the limit, and the extent of knowing, doing, and hoping reside between truth and freedom, concluding that man makes himself in the course of his history, in the interaction of his language, and in the use of his bios. Foucault's analyses constitute a Critique of the Same that necessarily consolidates itself into an Opening to the Other. In other words, by doing the Critique of the Same, that is, by delimiting the formations of knowledge, by establishing the limits of power relations, by fixing the possibilities of the practices of the self, one can promote Openness to Other ways of being, one can construct other discursive forms, other power relations, other subjectivities. In this sense, archeology, genealogy, and hermeneutics are read as methodological tools used by Foucault to perform this Critical determination of what is the Same of a certain time and place in order to finally make us think about the Opening to the Other. Literature and language are seen as knowledge Other, painting, engraving, photography, cinema, and theater as power Other, and the aesthetics of the self together with politics are seen as expecting Other. Experiences that manage to go beyond the Same and establish in the spheres of Knowledge, Power, and Self, the unheard of, what was never there before, neither as a source, nor as a limit, nor as an extension of theoretical, practical, or moral knowledge in the establishment of man's way of being. In this way, making possible an experience beyond man's beingItem Processos de subjetivação, governamentalidade neoliberal e resistência: uma leitura a partir de Michel Foucault e Judith Butler(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2020-11-30) Marinho, Cristiane Maria; Lopes, Adriana Delbó; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6600189022732543; Aguiar, Odilio Alves; Candiotto, Cesar; Duarte, André de Macedo; Lopes, Adriana Delbó; Silva, Adriano CorreiaThis research aims at presenting the analytic of power and the notion of resistence in Michel Foucault's thinking, as well as to explain the way in which Judith Butler talks over these concepts and develops them in an original and updated reading of the contemporary neoliberal governmentality. The thesis defended here, was that, to those two philosophers, exists a crucial importance in the subjectivation process, both in the exercise of power of neoliberal governanmentability as for the formation of resistence against this governementality in particular, and in the ethical-political-economic contemporaneity of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Firstly, it has been presented here Foulcadian analytic of power, highlighting the same subjectivation processes in the exercise of the mechanisms of modern and contemporary power and in Butler's proposition about the need for developing a new analytic of power, updating Foucault's writings, but starting off from the new movements of contemporary power and describing the upsurge of sovereignty within governamentality. And then, it has been further developed the notion of neoliberal governmentality, typifying the German and American neoliberalism and, following foucaultian's analysis, it has been proved that the neoliberalism is, more than just an economic paradigm, a liberal rationality, being the process of subjetivation a critical category in the exercise of power. There has also been presented Butler's dialogue with these foucauldian issues with regard to the "assujettissement" in which criticizes Foucault for disregarding some subvertion potential within the psyche in the analysis of power and in the formation of resistence to the exercise of governmentality. Finally, it has been addressed the possibilities of resistence to the power of neoliberal governmentality in Foucault and Butler and their agonistic clash, in addition to a short genealogy of the notion of resistence in Foulcault's work, exploiting the importance of the processes of subjectivation in the exercise of the governmental power as well as in the exercise of resistence to mechanisms of power starting off with the practices of freedom, of aesthetics of existence as well as the Criticism, taking into account the notions of "parresía" and counter-conduct. It has also been presented that Butler, inspired by Foucault, thinks about the centrality of processes of subjectvation in the resistence to the neoliberal governmentality, starting off from foucaudian criticism as virtue; of performative politics; of neoliberal precariety; of alliance of the diversities in search of recognition; of the post-identity interdependence, but without refusal of identities.Item O personagem Descartes: as tensões de Nietzsche com o projeto inicial da modernidade(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2019-10-04) Melo, Eder David de Freitas; Richardson, John; http://as.nyu.edu/faculty/john-richardson.html; Lopes, Adriana Delbó; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6600189022732543; Lopes, Adriana Delbó; Viesenteiner, Jorge Luiz; Frezzatti Júnior, Wilson Antônio; Itaparica, André Luis Mota; Dalla Vecchia, Ricardo BazílioWith this dissertation we aim to analyze Nietzsche writings on Descartes, focusing mainly, but not exclusively, on the book Beyond Good and Evil. Our central hypothesis is that such mentions, in a critical perspective, are configured by Nietzsche as controversy, as an argumentative strategy of philosophical opposition to Descartes as a character, forming tensions with the grounds and the edges of the early modernity. In other words, Descartes, as Nietzsche writes about him in Beyond Good and Evil, would be a character that, as a magnifying glass, works as a rhetorical element to display problems barely noticed, aside and remaining elements that, despite their marginality, would tacitly rule modernity. The result of this approach, coupled with our defense of Descartes as a character in Beyond Good and Evil, will be an exposition of some limits of the Cartesian philosophical project, relatively to those aside and remaining elements. In addition, some Nietzsche's new determinations will be underlined, such as an organic sense identified through thought, this as an element of the body; a meaning of conscious thoughts as ruled by instincts; subjectivity as an expression of the gregarious demands of the species and the self as a silent expression of individuality.Item O tempo do fim: diálogo e antítese no uso do messianismo paulino pela filosofia de Giorgio Agamben(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2020-11-12) Pereira, Pedro Lucas Dulci; Lopes, Adriana Delbó; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6600189022732543; Giacoia Junior, Oswaldo; Ruiz, Castor Bartolomé; Paula, Marcio Gimenes de; Correia, Adriano; Lopes, Adriana DelbóThis work has as its main objective to defend the political importance of the messianic theme of the time of the end. Unlike the superficiality of relations established between time and politics by the advocates of the thesis about the end of history, this formulation of the political significance of the messianic theme of the time of the end, comes from the analysis in ethics and political philosophy of the work of Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben, and the dialogue he establishes with the Western theological and philosophical tradition. Regarding this theme, our arguments in the present work will take the following path. First, we will dedicate the initial chapter to an archeology of the way of governing infinitely individuals, characteristic of our political contemporaneity. The key question in this first chapter is, therefore, why has politics been transformed into mere body management? With the help of a thematic relationship established with some courses taught by Michel Foucault at the Collège de France, we will seek to defend the Agambenian reading from the state of decline in which contemporary ethics and politics are found. We will try to make it clear that the current political configuration does not only concern what Foucault called modern governmentality, but also Agamben's arguments about the need for praise and glory for the undetermined functioning of the political machine. Second, we will focus itself in the messianic theme of the time of the end, in his Pauline formulation, as a Agamben’s strategy to address to the legal and political situation of our time described in the first chapter. Our objective in the second chapter, therefore, will be to argue that the use, by Agamben, of theological paradigms arising from the epistles of Paul de Tarsus, presents itself as a useful intellectual alternative to equip his readers with a theoretical repertoire that be subordinate to the end-of-history theses – and be able to carry out a renewal in our framework of categories and concepts in a way that opens up the possibility of new free uses of the essential components for political philosophy and ethics in the contemporary world. The recovery of these theological paradigms will mean asking ourselves in general terms why Paul de Tarsus is important for contemporary philosophy and, specifically, why he is important for Agamben's philosophy. Finally, in the third chapter, we will try to make a critical assessment of the content of the Agambenian theses, trying to answer the question why is it difficult to be an Agambenian? With this question, we will try to explain the challenges that are inherent in the possibilities of using the Pauline paradigms for political challenges, as well as the difficulty of dealing with the long linearities that the Italian philosopher establishes from his representations of the time lived in the messiah. Through a careful reading of some methodological pillars in the philosophy of the Italian thinker, we believe that it will be possible to show not only the contributions, but also the limits of his intellectual project. Therefore, this thesis establishes both the dialogue and the antithesis with the use that Agamben makes of the messianic themes formulated by the apostle Paul. We believe that with this argument, as well as with the conclusions we reached, we will be able to contribute to a little explored theme, both as a key-hermeneutics of Agamben's philosophy, as a paradigm for the renewal of the frameworks of contemporary political and ethical philosophy. With that, we try to offer an original contribution to the agambenian studies in the Brazilian territory.