FF - Faculdade de Farmácia
URI Permanente desta comunidade
Navegar
Navegando FF - Faculdade de Farmácia por Autor "Alves, Vinícius de Medeiros"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
Item Desenvolvimento de modelos de QSAR e análise quimioinformática da sensibilização e permeabilidade da pele(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2014-03-17) Alves, Vinícius de Medeiros; Andrade, Carolina Horta; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2018317447324228; Andrade, Carolina Horta; Ferreira, Elizabeth Igne; Camargo, Ademir J.Repetitive exposure to a chemical agent can induce an immune reaction in inherently susceptible individuals that leads to skin sensitization. Although many chemicals have been reported as skin sensitizers, there have been very few reports analyzing the relationships between their molecular structure and the sensitization potential including the connection to skin permeability, which is widely considered to be mechanistically implicated in sensitization. In this study, we have compiled, curated, and integrated the largest publicly available datasets related to chemically-induced skin sensitization and skin permeability. Unexpectedly, no correlation between sensitization and permeability has been found. Predictive QSAR models have been developed and validated for both skin sensitization and skin permeability using a standardized workflow fully compliant with the OECD guidelines. The classification accuracies of QSAR models discriminating sensitizers from non-sensitizers were 0.68-0.88 when evaluated on several external validation sets. When compared to the predictions generated by the OECD QSAR Toolbox skin sensitization module, our models had significantly higher prediction accuracy for the same sets of external compounds as evaluated by Positive Predicted Rate and Negative Predicted Rate as well as Correct Classification Rate. We have also developed QSAR models of skin permeability measured quantitatively. Cross-species correlation between human and rodent permeability data was found to be low (r²=0.44); thus, skin permeability models were developed using human data only and their external accuracy was q²ext = 0.87 (for 62% of external compounds found within the model applicability domain). Skin sensitization models have been employed to identify putative chemical hazards in the Scorecard database of possible skin or sense organ toxicants that should be regarded as primary candidates for the experimental validation.Item Estratégias computacionais como métodos alternativos para avaliação da sensibilização cutânea(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2017-05-12) Alves, Vinícius de Medeiros; Tropsha, Alexander; Muratov, Eugene; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9372290911831306; Andrade, Carolina Horta; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2018317447324228; Andrade, Carolina Horta; Oliveira, Gisele Augusto Rodrigues de; Ferreira, Márcia Miguel Castro; Costa, Fernando Batista da; Nascimento, Paulo Gustavo Barboni DantasIntroduction: Skin sensitization is a major environmental and human health hazard. Although many chemicals have been evaluated in humans, there have been no efforts to model these data to date. Skin sensitization is commonly evaluated using structural alerts. However, there has been a growing concern that alerts disproportionally flag too many chemicals as toxic, which questions their reliability as toxicity markers. The main goal of this thesis was to develop and apply new cheminformatics methods to predict skin sensitization of chemical compounds that lack experimental data. Methodology: It has been compiled, curated, analyzed, and compared the available human data and the murine (performed in mice) animal model data, named LLNA (local lymph node assay). Using these data, it was developed reliable computational models and applied them for virtual screening of chemical libraries to identify putative skin sensitizers. It was developed a freely accessible web-based application for the identification of potential skin sensitizers. In addition, it was demonstrated that contrary to the common perception of QSAR models as “black boxes” they can be used to identify statistically significant chemical substructures (QSAR-based alerts) that influence toxicity. Results and discussion: The overall concordance between murine LLNA and human skin sensitization responses for a set of 135 unique chemicals was low (R = 28-43%), although several chemical classes had high concordance. We have succeeded to develop predictive QSAR models of all available human data with the external correct classification rate of 71%. A consensus model integrating concordant QSAR predictions and LLNA results afforded a higher correct classification rate of 82% but at the expense of the reduced external dataset coverage (52 %). We used the developed QSAR models for virtual screening of CosIng database and identified 1,061 putative skin sensitizers; for seventeen of these compounds, we found published evidence of their skin sensitization effects. The developed Pred-Skin web app (http://www.labmol.com.br/predskin/) is based on binary QSAR models of human (109 compounds) and LLNA (515 compounds) data with good external correct classification rate (70-81% and 72-84%, respectively). It is also included a multiclass potency model based on LLNA data (accuracy ranging between 73-76%). Conclusions: Models reported herein provide more accurate alternative to LLNA testing for human skin sensitization assessment across diverse chemical data. In addition, they can also be used to guide the structural optimization of toxic compounds to reduce their skin sensitization potential. The Pred-Skin web app is a fast, reliable, and user-friendly tool for early assessment of chemically-induced skin sensitization. A new approach that synergistically integrates structural alerts and rigorously validated QSAR models for a more transparent and accurate safety assessment of new chemicals was also proposed.