O confisco constitucional de terras no Brasil e sua ineficácia como instrumento de combate ao trabalho escravo rural contemporâneo
Carregando...
Data
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
This dissertation examines the constitutional confiscation of land provided for in Article 243 of
the Brazilian Federal Constitution as an instrument to combat contemporary rural slave labor,
investigating the reasons for its persistent institutional ineffectiveness despite its explicit
constitutional status. The research addresses the problem of why the expropriatory sanction
established by Constitutional Amendment No. 81/2014 remains without concrete application,
even in the face of the structural persistence of contemporary slavery in rural Brazil. It advances
the hypothesis that this ineffectiveness does not result from normative weakness, but from the
combined effect of prolonged legislative omission, restrictive judicial patterns, and institutional
choices that neutralize structural patrimonial sanctions. The methodology is juridical-dogmatic,
combined with historical-constitutional analysis, institutional empirical data, and systematic
jurisprudential review. The first chapter reconstructs contemporary slave labor as a structural
phenomenon linked to land concentration and labor precariousness. The second chapter
analyzes constitutional land confiscation as an extreme patrimonial sanction grounded in the
social function of property and fundamental rights. The third chapter examines the institutional
limits to its enforcement, including legislative omission, judicial restraint, and a culture of
impunity, as well as critically assessing pending legislative proposals and the possible
analogical application of Law No. 8,257/1991 as a provisional and exceptional alternative. The
findings confirm the initial hypothesis, showing that constitutional confiscation remains legally
valid and normatively robust, yet institutionally neutralized. It concludes that its effectiveness
depends not only on statutory regulation but also on an interpretive and institutional
reorientation committed to the structural protection of human dignity and to dismantling the
economic foundations of contemporary rural slavery.