Comparison of physiological and psychobiological acute responses between high intensity functional training and high intensity continuous training
Carregando...
Data
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
Little is known about the physiological and psychobiological responses that occur during and after high intensity
functional training (HIFT). We compared physiological and psychobiological responses during and after a HIFT
session with a high intensity continuous training (HICT) session. Twenty-one trained and healthy men were
submitted to 20-min session of HIFT and HICT on separate days. The heart rate, blood lactate concentration [Lac],
levels of state anxiety, rates of perceived exertion (RPE) and perceived discomfort (RPE-D), and affective valence
were measured. Exercise intensity of the HICT was adjusted to the mean heart rate obtained in the HIFT session.
The highest heart rate in the training sessions was significantly higher in HIFT (mean standard deviation [SD]:
[187 9] bpm) than in HICT (mean SD: [178 8] bpm, p < 0.001). The [Lac] was significantly higher
immediately after the HIFT (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 6.8 [4.4] mmol/L) than the HICT (median [IQR]:
3.2 [1.9], p ¼ 0.021) and 10 min after (median [IQR]: HIFT ¼ 6.8 [4.9] mmol/L, HICT ¼ 2.9 [2.4] mmol/L, p ¼
0.003). The RPE was also significantly higher in the HIFT (median [IQR]: HIFT ¼ 20 [2], HICT ¼ 15 [5], p ¼
0.009). The physiological and psychobiological responses compared between HIFT and HICT sessions are similar,
except for the higher heart rate obtained during the sessions, [Lac] and RPE. Probably, the results found for the
higher heart rate obtained during the sessions, [Lac] and RPE may be explained by the higher participation of the
anaerobic glycolytic metabolism during the HIFT session.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Citação
SANTOS, Douglas A. T. et al. Comparison of physiological and psychobiological acute responses between high intensity functional training and high intensity continuous training. Sports Medicine and Health Science, Amsterdam, v. 7, n. 1, p. 68-76, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2023.10.006. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337623000781?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2026.