De "distorcidinha" à letra morta: é proibido cumprir a lei? O esvaziamento do art. 316, parágrafo único, do Código de Processo Penal pelo TJGO - análise do período de 23/01/2021 a 23/01/2022
Carregando...
Data
2022-04-14
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
In chapter 01 of this work, an empirical research was carried out on the judgments
rendered before the judgment of appeals that contained as a thesis raised the lack of review of
pretrial detention within ninety days, as provided for in art. 316, sole paragraph of the Criminal
Procedure Code, by the TJGO in the period from 01/23/2021 to 01/23/2022. In chapter 02, the
institution of the precautionary measure in Brazil was addressed, giving greater emphasis to the
institute of preventive detention in the Brazilian legal system and its confrontation in the face of
updated data on the Brazilian and Goiás prison population. Finally, in the third and last chapter,
Judicial Activism in Brazil was addressed, as well as its confrontation with Criminal Guarantees,
taking into account Penal Populism and the legitimation of stigmatization and imprisonment.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Prisão preventiva, Ativismo judicial, Garantismo penal, Preventive detention, Judicial activism, Criminal guarantee
Citação
BERNARDINO, Nathália Lemes Toledo. De "distorcidinha" à letra morta: é proibido cumprir a lei? O esvaziamento do art. 316, parágrafo único, do Código de Processo Penal pelo TJGO - análise do período de 23/01/2021 a 23/01/2022. 141 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação) – Unidade Acadêmica Especial de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Cidade de Goiás, 2022.