Original clinic reality study of intraradicular posts
Carregando...
Data
2015
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
Objetive: This study aimed to understand and analyze the systematic
use of post space, including its indications and most frequent
problems for professionals in Goiania-Go. Material and Methods:
We used a 16-question questionnaire applied to a sample of clinical
and/or experts in the fields of dentistry and dental prosthesis. We
conducted a random raffle among those enrolled in the Regional
Council of Dentistry of Goiás. 121 research professionals participated.
In order to compare proportions in levels of category variables,
a chi-square test was applied. Results: Cast core is used by
70.2% of respondents, while only 25.6% prefer prefabricated posts.
The most mentioned selection criteria were coronal, aesthetics and
extent of restoration, regardless of the type of retainer. Zinc phosphate
cement was the favorite material for cast post and core, and
resin cement the one for pre-fabricated fiberglass. Difficult removal
(57.9%), aesthetic risk (48.8%) and root fracture (44.6%) were
the most frequent problems with the cast post and core. Loss of
retention, filling and core pin fracture, and difficult removal were
the most prevalent problems with prefabricated posts. Conclusion:
Clinical experience and training proved decisive in the selection of
post space. Participants with more experience in service and dental
specialists tend to adopt more precise criteria for selection.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Dental prosthesis, Clinical competence, Dental pins, Clinical competence, Prótese dentária, Competência clínica, Pinos dentários
Citação
VILANOVA, Larissa S. R. et al. Original clinic reality study of intraradicular posts. Robrac: revista odontologica do Brasil Central, Goiânia, v. 24, n. 68, p. 2-5, 2015.