Ethos, estase e polidez: interações conflituosas no STF acerca da liberdade do ex-presidente Lula
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2022-12
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
The juridical field is very intriguing for the argumentation area
once juridical reasoning is revisable (DAMASCENO-MORAIS, 2019), in
which the Supreme Federal Court (STF) is the highest organ of Brazilian
Judiciary, responsible for assigning the final decision. By using the
Dialogal Model of Argumentation (PLANTIN, 2008, 2018; GRÁCIO, 2010,
2013), we analyzed discussions between STF ministers in the judgment
of the annulment of Lula’s conviction, where the theme of corruption
came up, putting on the spotlight the ethos / image (ARISTÓTELES,
2005) of the ministers, since they are expected to have a virtuous ethos
when it comes to such a delicate issue for Brazilian society as corruption.
As a result of our analysis, we verified that the (de)construction of the
virtuous ethos promotes stasis (conflict) in argumentative situations
between Supreme Court ministers.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
STF, Ethos virtuoso, Modelo dialogal, Estase argumentativa, Virtuous ethos, Dialogical model, Argumentative stasis
Citação
DAMASCENO-MORAIS, Rubens; FIGUEIREDO, Tatiane Silva. Ethos, estase e polidez: interações conflituosas no STF acerca da liberdade do ex-presidente Lula. Antares, Caxias do Sul, v. 14, n. 34, p. 159-191, set./dez. 2022. DOI: 10.18226/19844921.v14.n34.06. Disponível em: http://www.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/antares/article/view/11137. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.