Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito e Políticas Públicas
URI Permanente desta comunidade
Navegar
Navegando Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito e Políticas Públicas por Por Orientador "Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto"
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
Item Avaliação da gestão por organizações sociais como instrumento da política pública de educação profissional: diagnóstico crítico da experiência do estado de Goiás na perspectiva do constitucionalismo democrático(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2020-12-16) Barros, Renata Campos Bernardes; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6725961067847325; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto; Carvalho, Luciani Coimbra de; Tavares Neto, José QuerinoThis article is part of the collaborative insertion of organized civil society in the management of public services, a phenomenon that started in Brazil with the State Reform. We focus on the experience of the State of Goiás in the management of professional education, in the face of the problem of the lack of a practice of monitoring and evaluating the results of this public choice and its effects on public policy on professional education. With the objective of constructing theoretical and methodological subsidies for structuring a diagnosis of this phenomenon, a research promoted a study on the process of managerial administrative management, focusing on the Brazilian experience of education management and emphasizing an analysis of the possibility conditions for the constitutional adequacy of this management choice, in view of public policy objectives. There was also a mapping of the experience of the Rede ITEGO, a structure of the Goiás government focused on offering professional education, in order to characterize its modus operandi and the insertion of social associations in this context, with an emphasis on the analysis of failures in terms of preparation, regulation and planning of contract monitoring and evaluation routines. At the end, it presents a first diagnosis of the performance of these associations, focusing on a legal analysis of public policy.Item Controle dos incentivos fiscais de ICMS no estado de Goiás: um estudo de caso múltiplo das instituições de controle interno e externo nos âmbitos da atuação, transparência e articulação(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2022-06-17) Lolli, Eduardo Henrique; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6725961067847325; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto; Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado; Silva, Maria Stela Campos daThe present work stems from theoretical and empirical research (multiple case study) with the objective of carrying out a diagnosis of the performance of 3 (three) institutions in Goiás (CGE/GO, TCE/GO and ALE/GO) in terms of internal control and external tax incentives and waiver of ICMS revenues, in the indicative period from 2014 to 2019, as well as developing forecasts for incremental improvements in the transparency and effectiveness of the respective control. The research can be classified as legal-descriptive, legal-propositional and, occasionally, legal-comparative, as well as exploratory in the theoretical part. For the evaluation of these institutions, 3 (three) criteria are considered, pillars of a constitutionally adequate control, namely, the effective exercise of the respective attributions in this matter; the access of the aforementioned institutions to information and data necessary for audits, inspections and other inspection work; and the existence of inter-institutional articulation between these institutions. In the context of the main approach methodology, the Case Study, the hypothetical-deductive method was used as support for the testing of phenomena and propositions; and, as instruments, bibliographic, jurisprudential and literature review, regulatory analysis (especially federal and state standards), collection of primary data through interviews with participants from selected institutions, collection of secondary data made available in active transparency or upon request access to information formulated by the author with public bodies and private entities and document analysis. It also used, as a starting point, the author's perceptions arising from the experience as one of the prosecutors who advised the CPI on Tax Incentives of ALE/GO between 2019 and 2020. importance of its evaluation; the Law and Public Policy Approach (DPP) applied to tax incentives; the understanding of fiscal incentives as public expenditure and as a subsidy/encouragement, based on the notion of extrafiscality; the 3 (three) pillars for a constitutionally adequate control of tax incentives and waiver of ICMS revenue previously presented and that can be summarized in the trinomial performance, information/transparency and articulation, in addition to considerations about the design of each program and type of incentive ICMS tax in the State of Goiás, based on the state of the art of legal discussions on the subject. The main results found are the late (and incipient, in many aspects) supervisory action by the controlling institutions, although it is possible to say that there have been some advances, especially from 2019; the institutions' difficulty in accessing information and data, notably at the taxpayer/beneficiary level, due to the imposition of tax secrecy, as well as the lack of transparency on part of the control actions developed; and a very incipient articulation between the institutions in this matter, especially until 2018. The main propositional conclusions of the study point to the need to strengthen the controlling institutions regarding the aforementioned pillars and, mainly, to increase transparency in this matter, including so that the civil society itself can exercise a role of control and pressure for state responsiveness in this matter.Item Mineração e desenvolvimento constitucionalmente adequado: análises com enfoque em políticas públicas e diagnósticos dos impactos da mineração para o (não) desenvolvimento local em Goiás(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2020-12-16) Neves, Alice Santos Veloso; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6725961067847325; Campello, Lívia Gaigher Bósio; Silva, Robert Bonifácio da; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira PintoThe mining activity is highlighted in the scenario of the State of Goiás, but what is its return with the expansion of local Public Policies? This research lends itself to investigating whether the impact of mining activity on local development is negative or positive in the municipalities of the State of Goiás. A discussion is proposed based on scientific evidence, in favor of improving local development, in contrast the two rhetorical disputes in the mineral sector, one in favor and the other against mining. A critical diagnosis of mining activity is carried out in the municipalities of Goiás, by raising different social indicators related to mining municipalities in Goiás, which are then refined, according to a careful methodology, to enable pairing with other non-mining municipalities, with a wide range of interpreted data. from contemporary constitutionalism from a critical perspective. In all the mining municipalities analyzed, there are no elements translated into the various development verification indexes that would make these municipalities stand out over non mining municipalities. This finding frustrates the positive view linked to mining activity and leads to a more accurate look by the Public Administration on the values and effective uses of CFEM, which enables a more inclusive, constitutionally adequate municipal development. In the end, based on the diagnosis made and based on the scientific evidence raised, some propositional analyzes are indicated.Item Efetividade da democracia deliberativa em municípios de pequeno porte: pesquisa ação para atuação do Ministério Público na promoção da participação social nas escolhas públicas(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2020-02-13) Silva, Leonardo Seixlack; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6725961067847325; Coelho, Saulo de Oliveira Pinto; Neves, Cleuler Barbosa das; Ferreira, DanielThe present work has as its object the analysis of instruments of deliberative democracy in political institutions, with a focus on the concern for an effective social participation in these organizations and on the search for interventions capable of promoting democratic improvement of these instruments, notably through a co-participative performance and non-substantialist resolution of the Public Prosecutor's Office. To this end, an action research was carried out to carry out diagnoses, plans, actions and evaluations aimed at improving social participation in institutions of the local government. It starts with the problem context related to the low democratic quality and the low effectiveness of social participation in institutions aimed at this purpose. The research is limited to three instruments: councils of municipal public policies, public hearings and mechanisms of active and passive transparency. In view of the perception of a problem context of low effectiveness of these instruments, the research aims to understand how an efficient performance of the Public Prosecutor's Office is possible, in the sense of verifying institutional flaws and practices established in these deliberative instances, aiming to build better ways of acting in guaranteeing effective social participation. It started from the theoretical references of deliberative democracy, notably in the formulation of Jurgen Habermas, corrected by the theory of directly deliberative polyarchy, developed by Joshua Cohen, which rehabilitates the importance of institutionally constituted spaces for the effectiveness of democratic proceduralism. Due to professional characteristics, the present action research was geographically limited to the Municipality of Mossâmedes (GO). For this, the methodological protocol used research techniques to survey and systematize primary data, document analysis, conducting semi-structured interviews and applying questionnaires. A complete cycle of action research was carried out for each participatory instrument investigated, starting with a previous diagnosis, with case study characteristics, which was followed by a systematic planning of actions, monitored implementation of interventional actions and, sequentially , evaluation of the results achieved with the interventions and the cycle of action research carried out. The main results of the research were: the verification through diagnoses that there are serious failures in the functioning of the instruments of deliberative democracy in institutionalized organizations, compromising the effective social participation in the formulation of public policies in small municipalities; the finding that the Public Prosecutor's Office must act in a co-participatory manner to correct and overcome these failures; the identification, on the other hand, of the need for the Public Prosecutor's Office itself to adopt a less substantialist and more dialogical stance, in order to prevent the performance from becoming a substitute for social participation, which is constitutionally inadequate; the identification that action research is an adequate methodological strategy to guide efforts aimed at institutional improvement of the practices and routines of the Public Prosecutor's Office; the elaboration, as a result of the action research developed, of a roadmap indicating the best practices to be adopted by the Public Prosecutor's Office in small municipalities in improving the conditions for greater social participation in the construction of public choices in these places.