Administração pública, conflito e arbitragem: política pública de acesso extrajudicial à justiça
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2019-08-12
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
This research lends itself to investigate the phenomenon of arbitration within the Public
Administration. In this sense, it begins by studying the so-called consensus management
paradigm, in which the state opens itself to the consensual solution of conflicts. It also focuses
on the general study of arbitration, exploring its character, at the same time, contractual and
jurisdictional, identifying its elements and pointing to how they come to be conceived when
the Public Administration participates in the process, either as a party, or in the position of
arbiter. A conflict analysis is made, indicating, from game theory, how in the arbitral process
the conflicting parties can behave cooperatively, even though they occupy opposite poles.
Then, using a functional analysis of the law aimed at a legal study of public policies, is
investigate how arbitration can function as a public policy of access to justice, having
instrumental (media) and teleological (end) content characteristic of a public policy. There is a
qualitative research, with a bibliographic documentary approach, for the development of the
theoretical questions, with the aid of case study. It also uses the dialectical-argumentative
method, taking advantage of elements of the rhetorical study of law. As for the theoretical
references, the research uses post-positivism, philosophical hermeneutics, the functionalist
approach to law and game theory applied to conflicts.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Citação
NATAL, Miccael Pardinho. Administração pública, conflito e arbitragem: política pública de acesso extrajudicial à justiça. 2019. 156 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito e Políticas Públicas) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2019.