Escrita e reescrita: as relações dialógicas entre ensino e aprendizagem
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2020-02-28
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
The present research fits into the strategy of a case study (LÜDKE; ANDRÉ, 1986;
YIN, 2005) and follows the interpretive qualitative paradigm (BORTONI-RICARDO,
2008; KRIPKA et al., 2015; SUASSUNA, 2008), and its objective is to observe the
dialogical relations between the process of writing and rewriting texts of 9th grade
students. For this, our theoretical assumptions are based on the following theories:
the Philosophy of Language proposed by the Circle of Bakhtin, whose principle is
Dialogism (BAKHTIN, 2011; BAKHTIN/VOLÓCHINOV, 2017); text concepts
(FERNANDES, E., 2007; KOCH, 2018), textuality (BEAUGRANDE; DRESLLER, 2005);
the importance of writing, rewriting and textual production developed as a procedural
work (FERNANDES, E., 2007; MENEGASSI, 1998, 2001); the conceptions of
discursive and textual genres (BAKHTIN, 2011; MARCUSCHI, 2008; 2010),
highlighting the characteristics of the opinion article, as it is the genre of the texts
that make up the corpus of this work (BRÄKLING, 2000; RODRIGUES, 2000); and
also about the official teaching regulation, in order to verify the teaching of discursive
genres in the institutional guiding documents, such as the PCNs (BRASIL, 1998b) and
the BNCC (BRASIL, 2018). Participants are 9th grade students of a public school in
Goiânia, as well as the Portuguese language teacher responsible for the classes. The
data were generated from August to September 2019 and a total of 60 pairs of texts
were passed on to us by the teacher considering their 1st and 2nd versions. Through
this investigation, in view of our objectives, in general, the results showed that both
PCNs and BNCC are based on a teaching-learning perspective through discursive
genres. In addition, we found that there were dialogical and linguistic changes from
the first written text to its second version, since the student managed to make
significant changes. This makes us consider that there was, in fact, a process of
rewriting. Although in the second version there are still some deviations when
compared to the first one because the student developed other points of view and
showed a responsive dialogical attitude. In addition, it managed to use some
argumentative operators of cause and consequence. Therefore, we consider that
there was a maturation in the student’s written practice.
Descrição
Citação
ASSIS, L. R. S. Escrita e reescrita: as relações dialógicas entre ensino e aprendizagem. 2020. 107 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras e Linguística) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2020.